Do you want to write for Squarefootball? Contact us on Twitter for more details.
NewsNow

« Fantasy Football: Could Gervinho be worth a call up? | Squarefootball homepage | Liverpool v Manchester United: Five classic encounters »

Saturday, 22 September 2012

Manchester City v Arsenal: Money v principles


Bookmark and Share

Sqf arsenal banner

It's the big game this weekend. Two giants of the English game go head-to-head in a match that could determine the destination of this year's title and means so much to both sets of fans. No, I'm not talking about Liverpool v Manchester United. Frankly I don't care much what happens in that game, though it will make me smile knowing that United lost. 
For me, the only game of the weekend is at the Etihad as Manchester City host Arsenal - the game between the champions and probable contenders.

Just for the record, Arsenal have been the most successful team against City in recent times. Out of the past 30 games played, we have amassed 68 points with 21 wins and five draws. Going into this game though, I think it's fair to say all we Gooners will be happy with a draw. How did this happen? Money is the easy answer, but wait there is a bit more to it as well.

Yes money has played the most vital role in it, City with the Sheiks on board have transformed from being the noisy neighbors to champions, and even though we hate to admit it we have fed them well as well. Arsenal have sent or lost most of their players to City and it's no coincidence. Money and ambition does play its part, but the bigger picture is that while Arsenal consolidated their position, City went overboard and jumped above all.

It is no coincidence that after 2005 while Arsenal moved on to their new stadium and yet continued their self-sustaining model, the likes of Chelsea initially and now City took over Arsenal's position where it really mattered - in the league table.

Arsenal's greatness has been able to sustain and not capitulate in the burgeoning modern day football whereas City's success is bred on the theory that what you don't have can always be bought for the right price. 

Would Arsenal have been still challenging for top honours if they had not moved to a new stadium or had they not lost their most important players for whatever reasons or if they had pumped in money is an all together different question. A decision was taken by the club and whether it was liked or not, it was the right one. Chelsea and City capitalised and it may have left a bitter taste in the mouth, but that would have still happened.
People say Arsenal had enough funds to go for a player like say Javi Garcia, but does anyone really think we would have paid over the odds to get him at all costs? Unlikely, even if we wanted to. Would we have got into a slug fest with City as if it was a bidding war and keep raising stakes? No way. Not a chance. There needs to be a sense in the insane world and proudly I say it is us who have it.
What has happened is the transition did take its toll on the Gunners, not by their league position only but also because suddenly they weren't the "lucrative" option any more. In comparison City suddenly appeared with bright headlights to anyone with a bit of a name, who wanted to play in a team of stars and insane weekly wages.
Arsenal were never the team for the superstars, but they were the most attractive to play for.
To be fair on City, it has not just been spending insane money, it's been a project which has started paying dividends now. Initially it was like hit and grab whereas now it is more meticulous. The result is that City have assembled a "team" rather than 11 superstars.

As Arsenal play City on Sunday, it shows the changing times in football and in life. City represent the the amalgamation of power and money and ruthlessness to succeed on all counts, whereas Arsenal represent the old school of principles, ideologies and charm and hope.
Don't get me wrong at the end of the day both teams play for the same reason  - to win at all cost, means maybe different. City have chosen their path and Arsenal did so as well. Are City wrong and are Arsenal right? No. Each one will say we are right. At the end of the day, ask a supporter. He will say go and win the damn game mate we can talk about ethics later.

Last but not least to all city fans - You can buy anything you want but you cannot buy class. You see that my friend is permanent.
Article by Vinay McClaren
Calling all Arsenal fans: Do you agree with Vinay's assessment? Whatever your view we'd love to hear from you.
For more Arsenal articles, click here

KickNews.net - Football News & Transfers

Follow sqfMelvin on Twitter

ConvoTrack

Colin Illingworth

Comments

 

Twitter & Facebook

TweetBook? Face-itter? No, not Face-itter; TweetBook it is.

sqF writers* on Twitter

Get in touch with sqF if you want to be added ...
* Past & present

sqF on Facebook

Adverts

Our laughable attempt to raise revenue.